These questions are from "Overcoming Enterprise Search Challenges," an AIIM Wednesday WEbinar. If you missed it, listen at www.aiim.org/webinararchive.
Q: Can you provide some
insight into how enterprise search is being used for electronic discovery
needs?
One of the highest costs of the
legal discovery process is the review of the multitude of documents that
surface during the discovery exercise. There is usually a direct relationship
between the number of documents being reviewed and the time and cost of the
discovery process. An enterprise search solution can help an organization assess
the magnitude of information that a potential discovery action would uncover
and also help reduce the number of non-relevant results. Similarly, a search
can help determine where the bulk of the information is located, who created it,
and provide clues to its accessibility. Moreover, using conceptual search tools
and filtering, it is possible to reduce or minimize the amount of documents
that will need to be reviewed, by eliminating poor search results and
reducing “noise.” This approach has its flaws, however. Search engines often ignore
similar or redundant content when creating results lists. Also, depending on how
it is configured, search will not return content or information that is
protected by security or access controls, or offline content such as information
stored on back-up tapes. In addition, there is the difficulty of searching
across an entire organization’s desktop and notebook computers. Lastly, there is
no guarantee that the process will identify all information relevant to the
case.
Q: Do you find that when your customers expand
their search project to e-discovery, they have to start from scratch with new
products and strategies?
Organizations that have an existing enterprise search solution in place
can, of course, gain the benefits listed in the response to the previous
question. But legal discovery is not only about finding content, but taking action on
that content as well. For example, in a typical discovery exercise, it is
necessary to identify relevant information and mark or flag that content so that it
cannot be moved or deleted, in a process known as “legal hold.” Only recently has this
caught the attention of the major enterprise search vendors, who have been
working to add this additional functionality to their flagship enterprise search
solutions. For organizations that have already deployed enterprise search
products, this new functionality will likely appear as a future upgrade. For
those who have enterprise search deployed as part of an enterprise content
management (ECM) platform, it is likely that there will be multiple
choices: Your ECM vendor may already offer an e-discovery module, or you
can purchase third-party solutions to fill in the gaps.
Q: What is the future of social search?
As more organizations deploy social content management tools, such as blogs
or other collaborative tools. These content stores are increasingly becoming the
main source of “expert knowledge,” even if only on a departmental or divisional
level. I t is essential that organizations identify the patterns of this
knowledge sprawl, and ensure that their search solutions are actively crawling
and indexing these new centers of information. A ll of the enterprise search
solutions are currently able to search these emerging kinds of social content,
but the picture keeps changing as users find new and innovative ways to collect
and share information outside the traditional corporate framework. The challenge
will be for search vendors (and those ECM vendors that incorporate these
solutions) to keep up with the race, providing a flexible approach to
federation, or inexpensive connectors and adapters that will extend the
usefulness of their current products.
Q: What synergies are there in implementing
enterprise search along with ECM systems?
A t the simplest level, ECM means managing many kinds of organizational content
(documents, images, digital assets, Web content, etc.) in a consistent, unified,
and sometimes centralized fashion, and then providing “umbrella” services
across those content objects. Typical services include library functionality,
records management, and workflow. Similarly, search is also a key service
that should provide access to all of the content in an ECM repository. For
organizations with multiple ECM repositories, a search solution can provide a
single interface that provides access to the content in these systems without
having to separately search each one.
Jeff Phillips is
a principal consultant with
Doculabs.