In this issue, Infonomics trains its eyes on the
biotechnology industry. Recognized globally as an engine of economic growth,
biotechnology is linking basic research with vast new market opportunities
across a broad spectrum.
And, more strictly to the point, the biotechnology industry demands the
management of prodigious, ever-increasing quantities of content. Consider the
Human Genome Project (HGP), a 13-year effort coordinated by the U.S. Department
of Energy and the National Institutes of Health, to determine the sequences of
the three billion chemical base pairs that make up human DNA.
Though the HGP is finished, analyses of the data will continue for many
years. By licensing technologies to private companies and awarding grants for
innovative research, the project catalyzed the multibillion-dollar U.S.
biotechnology industry and fostered the development of new medical applications.
Total U.S. employment in the biosciences reached 1.3 million in 2006 (the
latest year for which data are currently available), led by strong growth in the
research, testing, and medical lab subsector, according to the Biotechnology
Industry Organization (bio.org). The biosciences sector pays, on average, 68
percent higher salaries than the average private-sector job.
Academic bioscience R&D expenditures totaled $29 billion in fiscal
year 2006, accounting for more than 60 percent of total U.S. academic R&D.
And, this R&D is leading to discoveries with commercial potential.
Bioscience- related patents issued totaled 82,000 during 2002 to 2007.
Bioscience employment is distributed across all 50 states and Puerto
Rico.
The biotechnology, pharmaceutical, medical
devices, and other life
sciences have their work cut out for them when it comes to managing vast
stores of information. A frantic pace of scientific advancement, highly
regulated operating environment, long product lifecyles, data standardization,
and other compliance issues call for impeccable content and records management.
These enterprises must do a lot more than merely create miraculous new
products; to stay in business they must comply with a crushing load of
government regulations like FDA 21 CFR Part 11, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration’s (FDA) guidelines on electronic records and electronic
signatures that define the criteria under which e-records and e-signatures are
considered trustworthy, reliable and equivalent to paper records. These
guidelines intersect with enterprise content management (ECM) on many levels,
not the least of them the frenzy of documentation and processes required for
audits, quality management, electronic signatures, and more.
Peg Mitchell, senior director of IT for the project management office and
software quality at Carlsbad, Calif.-based Life Technologies, says in the last
handful of years many content silos have gone away, thanks in part to improved
interfaces of ECM solutions which encourage use. “There’s been an evolution of
sorts in IT which has converged and become better at user interfaces and
user-friendly features,” she explains.
Life Technologies is a global biotech company, recently formed by the merger
of two established companies: Invitrogen and Applied Biosystems. Invitrogen is a
life science company in disease and drug research, bioproduction and
diagnostics. Applied Biosystems develops advanced genomic technologies that
include DNA sequencing systems and chemistries to perform sophisticated DNA
sequencing solutions.
Improved technologies and vigilant governance mean less searching for
critical information and less trapped content that’s locked up in laptops,
e-mail systems and other silos. Says Mitchell: “Governance is around the content
itself that is shared: how it’s stored, how it’s tagged, etc., so that it
doesn’t become just a big mess of nonsearchable, non-shareable information that
once again becomes lost in a black hole.”
All ECM solutions, from basic document management to social networking tools,
are rife with the regulatory and compliance issues in the life sciences field.
Mitchell adds: “You want the fast exchange of ideas around the content to be
agile and productive but you still have regulations, IP (intellectual property)
to protect as well as the potential for litigation or e-discovery. You have to
manage all that.”
Social Networking and Web 2.0 Injections
Software
vendors have recently taken their regimens to the next level by combining
content management with collaboration tools like voice, video and instant
messaging (IM). “We’re seeing a trend where the technology is allowing us to do
workflow, even audio, video, Web conferencing, exchanging documents and IM, but
we haven’t reached a point where these technologies are integrated. Many vendors
are acquiring niche players to gain these capabilities,” says Manoj Prasad,
senior director for enterprise architecture and mobile applications at Life
Technologies.
Industry insiders say social networking and other Web 2.0 applications have
also influenced the management of content and collaboration inside their
companies. Says Prasad: “The push is more to understand how we can use these new
tools today to capture, manage, and search content, people, and communities
inside the company versus just your basic document management capabilities from
the storage perspective.”
Invitrogen’s late 2008 purchase of Applied Biosciences formed Life
Technologies and the merger of the two companies brings the challenge of
bringing employees from two different companies together to allow for seamless
collaboration and communications, Prasad says. To this end, the company plans to
implement an integrated content management/collaboration solution over a
three-to-five year horizon. At the same time, LifeTechnologies is planning an
internal social networking application which may broaden to include the outside
scientific community and expand its limited internal blogging for better
collaboration.
A particularly swift deployment of an internal company platform for employee
communications was successfully launched by Life Technologies once the merger
was official in November 2008. The intranet collaboration space, complete with
document sharing and video updates by the CEO, is still used today. “It was a
big concerted effort by the CEOs and research and development (R&D)
scientists who came out of the starting gate to share information,” Mitchell
says, noting that other Web 2.0 tools include wikis, internally faced to both
companies.
The life sciences industry tends to thoroughly evaluate technologies before
making a move, says Cheryl McKinnon, director of program management for the
Enterprise 2.0 group at Open Text, an ECM solutions provider in Waterloo,
Ontario. Caution must be taken with Web 2.0-style technologies that don’t fly in
highly controlled environments. Nevertheless, she says, companies are
increasingly looking at lightweight collaboration tools that are quick to deploy
for fast return on investment (ROI).
“Most of the uses of collaborative tools are around drug discovery, not so
much about clinical trials, which require highly controlled documentation,” adds
Therese Harris, program manager for life sciences with Open Text. However, one
contract research organization that Harris is aware of uses a Microsoft
SharePoint interface to manage documents in an Open Text repository to manage a
drug trial research project which includes inputs from patients, physicians and
other members outside of a drug company’s four walls. The online solution
greatly aids FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance, bypassing the need to move paper
around physically via courier, mail, fax or e-mail. “These types of solutions
for drug trials are very elegant and very forward, aiding compliance,” Harris
notes.
The French-owned life sciences company bioMerieux uses Open Text’s ECM
solutions for basic document management involving its broad content-control,
says Eric Himel, business systems analyst with bioMerieux in Durham, N.C. As
well, customers use convenient pull-down menus to access information they need
such as material safety data sheets, package inserts, and product labels on an
Open Text ECM interface (formerly LiveLink).
A world leader in the field of in vitro diagnostics (medical tests conducted
in a test tube), bioMérieux, headquartered in Lyon, France, develops diagnostic
solutions including reagents, instruments and software that determine the source
of disease. Its products are used in the area of cardiovascular health, cancer
screening, and monitoring as well as detecting microorganisms in agri-food,
pharmaceutical and cosmetic products.
The company is in the process of setting up an online collaborative community
for its R&D function across several alliance partners. “Scientists will be
able to collaborate and share information between our sister companies in the
Merieux Alliance using blogs, wikis, and other tools,” Himel says.
On the realm of quality management and safety for managing its Corrective and
Preventive Actions (CAPA), Maya Ramachandran, information services and
technologies manager in quality assurance and regulatory affairs, also at
bioMerieux’s Durham office, says once an upgrade to the latest Open Text
Enterprise Services release is complete along with an enterprise SAP
implementation, the company looks forward to routing quality and change controls
documentation electronically, bypassing today’s manual processes for routing
documentation across facilities and country borders.
As Himel notes, the biggest changes behind these automated workflow
initiatives come in the form of re-engineering company processes worldwide. “The
problem is aligning the processes, not the technology.”
The Challenge: Using Web 2.0 Beyond Its Social Aspects
Bruce Johnson,
business advisory board member at Eden Prairie, Minn.-based Infobionics, a
provider of platform solutions for knowledge mining and managing director of
data architecture at Boston-based Recombinant Data Corp., a healthcare data
warehousing provider, says even Facebook-style profile pages within an
enterprise can facilitate better research by allowing scientists to connect and
collaborate. “The challenge is how do you adequately get notified when something
is pertinent to you and how do you validate the accuracy of that information?”
User-friendly, intuitive interfaces are the hallmark of social networking and
Wikipedia-style knowledge sharing, notes Harris of Open Text, citing legions of
under-30 biotech workers. “This Web 2.0 generation grew up on Facebook and
MySpace and wants to share information. They don’t want to have to learn a new
client server architecture or Web interface. They want to work the way they work
the Web.” But Mitchell says the challenge is to provide value with Web 2.0 tools
beyond their social aspects to harness information in a way without allowing
collaboration to become an unfettered Wild West. “You need the right amount of
governance without stifling the intent of these tools. How do you ensure that
the usage is appropriately targeted for moving our business forward?”
Life Technologies is looking at hosting instant messaging-enabled white pages
of sorts to create its own social networking platform where employees can put up
profile pages allowing them to list their professional interests as well as to
pick and choose what areas by topic or management groups from which they want to
receive communications.
Prasad predicts the ECM market will soon see four or five players with
end-toend collaboration, communication, and content management functionality,
ultimately enabling employees to become more efficient and for companies to
interact. Biotech may be a cautious adopter of some ECM technologies—but early
test results show it’s an innovator.
Marcia Jedd is a Minneapolis-based marketing consultant and writer
and frequent contributor to Infonomics. Her website is www.marciajedd.com.
Please read the two sidebars to this article:
Anatomy
of an ECM Solution
RX for
Medical Advances
For more information contact the Biotechnology Industry Organization . BIO represents
more than 1,200 biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state
biotechnology centers and related organizations across the United States and in
more than 30 other nations.