Why isn't there an app for that?

Community Topic(s):

Keywords: Web 2.0, ECM, cloud, iPad, Box.net, Open Text, Aaron Levie

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

During the recent AIIM conference, I was one of many folks tweeting, and tracking others' tweets, using the #aiim10 hashtag. One of the posts that surfaced was a guest post (http://www.fiercecontentmanagement.com/story/box-net-ceo-thoughts-newbie-aiim-2010/2010-04-27) to the Fierce Content Management blog from the CEO of Box.net, Aaron Levie. Two of the points he made really rang true for me. First, he argued that "vendors need to go beyond the next upgrade." He noted that there is a real benefit to rolling out upgrades as they are made available, rather than waiting for an every-6-months or every-year upgrade. Now the immediate argument from the vendor community is that those upgrades are often good for a chunk of revenue, or underscore the value of vendor maintenance agreements, or both. But I also know that recurring subscription revenue is often considered the "holy grail" for vendors because it's guaranteed revenue that doesn't have to be resold again each time. And that's precisely what the cloud provides: a subscription model where a customer made is often a customer kept, if for no other reason than through organizational inertia. There's a related point that Levie doesn't make but that I can and will: the upgrade model is incredibly difficult to test and make stable enough for release. This is true for all software, and the more complex and powerful the software, the more difficult it becomes. Introducing features incrementally allows vendors to introduce them more quickly to take advantage of opportunities while making them less likely to destabilize the existing code. The other point that jumped out at me is a far more powerful one. Levie asks, "...there were quite a few iPads floating around the AIIM Expo, but how many ECM vendors had an app?" I checked, and as of Friday, April 30, there was precisely one ECM-ish app in the Apple App Store. It comes from Open Text and is their Social Media Mobile app. The app appears to tie into their forays into Web 2.0, but it wasn't immediately clear whether or how it would access an Open Text repository. But I'm thinking that that's one of the iPad "killer apps" almost by definition. Think medical records, or insurance claims processors, or any of a number of other processes that require mobile access to information. For some of these, the iPhone is used but is certainly not ideal because of the small screen. Put an ECM app on an iPad and put the entire contents of the repository at the user's fingertips - onsite, on a plane (with suitable offline downloading & synching capabilities), or wherever access would be helpful. One of the significant reasons why the iPhone redefined the smart phone market was its ease of use - the thing "just worked" without requiring users to navigate fantastically complex menus or interfaces. An ECM app that had those qualities would be incredibly valuable to the end users who rely on ECM suites; when combined with the interoperability promised by CMIS, I think there is a substantial opportunity to radically change the way in which organizations interact with their information.
Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

Daniel O'Leary

Jesse I think this requires people from my generation to really push this into the ECM. AS a vendor, we focus on support for mobile devices because we are all skin grafted to them at this point. Would love to see you explore this topic from a generational / change management perspective in detail.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Nick Inglis

I think the primary reasons there aren't more apps out there in the ERM/ECM space is device security and corporate desire to head down that road. Device security hasn't really been standardized and there isn't any corporate strategy for the iPad yet (despite companies buying them by the case). In the corporate sphere I don't see a strong desire for adoption of apps that access content or secure records. My company was there with an app, but it was for the salespeople and assessing needs, not access to content. Box.net has an app for content access but I think they're the only ones right now, they're also on the iPhone so it was an easy translation I'd assume.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

I think that Levie's point was that box.net has an iPad app... It is a well-done, simple, and elegant app, but the basic functionality is also available by visiting box.net in Safari, the WebKit based browser bundled with the iPad.

One could make a strong argument that Safari is the device's most powerful, elegant, and flexible ECM app.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Daniel O'Leary

We are planning a mobile app for later this year, but in the meantime we optimize for Safari, and test on android and the iphone OS.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International