Why is measuring a hard ROI for SharePoint just so hard?

Community Topic(s):

Keywords: ROI, ROI enterprise 2.0 e2.0 email, SharePoint

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

Traditionally when it comes to implementing technology, the financial bean counters and decision makers have looked for hard dollars for the ROI of a technology investment.   However, when it comes to SharePoint, it seems we have thrown a hard ROI out the window.  In a manufacturing or factory environment, it’s generally easy to measure hard dollar costs of raw materials or labor costs or costs per hour.   Centuries of economic theory and practice led to the pioneering of the “scientific method” in the early part of the 20th century by Frederick Taylor and Henry Ford among others.  Implement "robot X" into the assembly line and produce more widgets and save on labor costs.  We have also had a few decades of TQM (total quality management) which has evolved into many buzzwords all seeking efficiencies in productivity of manufacturing and supply chains.  In Business School, I remember learning all kinds of management theory on these subjects and “generally accepted accounting principles” to calculate hard dollar costs and manage budgets to actual as well as profitability of goods sold.    So what happened to measuring ROI of SharePoint and why isn’t there enough written on it?  

I have read tons of articles on web 2.0, collaboration, and SharePoint.  They evangelize about grand topics like innovation and creating opportunities through communities and connecting people through social sites.  Some talk about the vision of enterprise content management being realized at an enterprise level.  And some articles even try to address ROI and talk about the “downstream effects” of capturing ideas and information in blogs or wikis.  Then we hear from executives and decision makers that evangelizing the technology sounds great, but all the benefits are “soft” and too hard to measure.  Okay, so why not measure "soft costs"?

The reality is that all businesses have soft costs such as turnover, lost productivity, low morale, lost sales and missed opportunities.  And any combination of those might drive soft cost dollars in your organization which can have big impact on your bottom line --- sometimes just as much as the hard costs and other times even more.   Many organizations simply don’t measure these types of costs because they don’t understand it or simply don’t have the capability to measure them.  Or perhaps people are just focused on meeting deadlines without questioning the value or impact to the customer.   Meanwhile, project management within many organizations seems like chaos, deadlines get missed, decisions are delayed, tiger teams get formed, and the insanity of our day to day work life continues.  Projects that should take only a few weeks or a few months, takes 12 or 18 months to complete and quality suffers as does employee morale.  You continue to wonder why things in your organization aren't as easy as what we see on Google or Facebook.  Then we recharge on the weekend, read the Dilbert cartoon in the Sunday paper, laugh and think of our own work environments, and do it all over again next week.  All the while we continue to email each other on our smart phones and at best upload documents to a site on SharePoint.   And if you're paying attention, there are no doubt hidden costs in many of the things just mentioned.

In today’s economic climate, it’s time we take a hard look at dollars and sense and focus on driving analytics from a collaboration & information management platform like SharePoint.   In my next series of blog entries, I’m going to focus on making measuring a hard ROI less hard and relate it specifically to real solutions implemented on SharePoint.  In the meantime, I'm interested in hearing more about soft costs in your organization and challenges or success you have had in measuring ROI of SharePoint....

Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

Alan Weintraub

I have found that to adequately define an ROI for SharePoint takes good objective information. When I work with organizations and end-users, I typically fond that they have good subjective reasons for implementing SharePoint, but these reasons cannot be tuned into an ROI that the executives will understand. I work with the users to develop a set of requirements that turns the subjective into objective requirements and allows for the ROI to be quantified. This technique has enabled the companies I worked with to define a Roadmap to implementation and an ROI at milestones along that Roadmap.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Rich Blank


It can be difficult because often times, the users are not measuring anything or the right things. The less structured the collaboration or process -- the harder it is to measure. And these informal business processes/activities often evolve and change over time which makes it even harder to measure. I try to map out the business activities that take place, key players, audience, information/data captured -- end to end. Then estimate cycle times, velocity, etc.. At least you have some starting point to measure against once you implement the SharePoint solution.

I'm interested in hearing more about your approach...
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Eric Landry

Well, I do measure hard costs, but that story only gets you so far. Plus, I also look at "as is" and "to be" processes, what efficiencies that will create, and how we can use the portal to enable process.... good process!

I also look at the opportunity costs (i.e. missed deadlines and project resources being stuck on old work) and economic costs, especially with ecommerce and manufacturing projects. If the plant's not completed, up and running, producing... the business is not getting revenue. But that's a hard sell as well.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Gerard Cawthorne

A solid Return On Investment calculation is difficult enough for any enterprise software implementation, if it is not seen as part of a bigger, business led initiative. However for SharePoint it can be even worse, say you just happen to license it via an existing enterprise agreement with MS. So you decide to utilize the the Business Intelligence features to build some dashboards - what is the ROI ? Well what was the initial investment in this case ? The product was already licensed and in use for collaboration sites......... etc etc

Overall I think focusing on hard or soft ROI can be too restrictive. The UK Office of Government Commerce has a methodology called 'Managing Successful Programmes' (MSP) which is, if you like the next level above the PRINCE 2 project management methodology. MSP puts a great emphasis on 'benefits management' - identifying the beneficial outcomes of any programme / initiative. To do this you have to measure the base state, and then measure again once you have implemented, in order to show that your programme has delivered tangible benefits.

Do you think this approach should be used more often ? Do you think it might be easier to describe tangible benefits from the of MySites and Enterprise Search for example ? Or do you think that in the current economy particularly we will never get past the 'hard cash' ROI calculation ?
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Rich Blank

I do agree that "benefits management" or "benefits realized" sound much better than hard or soft ROI. Regardless, there are some identified costs for SharePoint -- (in aggregate or looking at the cost/user). In the cloud or hosted internally. In a shared services enterprise model, the hw and sw costs are shared across the enterprise and in many large orgs, depts or divisions have some chargeback or cost for simply using the shared platform.

As the use of Sharepoint increases and continues to be leveraged in many new ways, some type of return or benefits are realized. The key is determining what business context you want to use the capabilities of SharePoint and what metrics you want to measure (before and after). For mysites, you can indeed have tangible results --- for example, how much time does it take on average to find the right resource for a project or pose a question? If that's days or weeks today, My Sites would cut that time into seconds by allowing you to search for expertise or people who with certain "activity streams" relating to your search. There are many studies around lost productivity spent searching for information -- which can be found on google in seconds :) So there are ways to translate SharePoint into numbers and promote the benefits realized...



Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Veronique Palmer

Thanks Rich, I am looking forward to this series, it will help us alot.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International