Must we stop using the social networking analogy to explain enterprise 2.0 ?

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

Enterprise 2.0 is a set of technologies, management and business practices, HR and legal framework that can be used for many purposes what makes it hard to say exactly what it is in a few words. It gets even worth when it comes to qualify enterprise 2.0 solutions because of the many experiences that can be looked for. Innovation, social networking, market predictions, wikis, blogs, rich profiling...all derserve the enterprise 2.0 label while sometimes looking very different.

The most used analogy is "social networking" because it cas embed all or many of the above so it's a rather easy concept to introduce both of technological and behavioral side of enterprise 2.0. As a matter of fact everybody have heard about social networks like Facebook or Twitter, many people have a facebook account and most of them are actually using it.

So Facebook seems to be the best enterprise 2.0 advocate when it comes to introduce things to novices. Even people who hate the comparison end to admit "ok...that's facebook for the enterprise" in order to confuse their interlocutors whith too complicated concepts.The paradox is that the said interlocutor often says himself "that's a corporate facebook" because he knows what it is and it helps him understanding what it can be used for, but, at the same time, he realizes he does not want facebook in the workplace because what he know about it is that it helps people connecting and sharing information to do anything except work.

Moreover, many Facebook heavy users don't have any idea of what to do when they're provided with a Facebook-like application in the workplace. Once again because social networks usages are often considered being personal and not work-related.

So Facebook (and social networks in general) are at the same time the best and the worse enterprise 2.0 advocates.

What should we learn from that :

- the difference between web 2.0 and enterprise 2.0, social networks and enterprise social networks is not in the product but in usage scenarios in context. But we already knew it.

- the value of any product is not in the product itself but in the change/adoption/business process rethinking (choose your prefered) program that comes with. Technology can be, in the worse case, an inhibitor, in the best case a catalyst, but will never fulfill the promise alone. That's known by the enterprise 2.0 world, still not enough by the enterprise world, and is still a problem for many vendors because it's hard to say that the value of the technology that's sold is in the service that comes with or will be provided by a third party. 

- enterprise 2.0 is a promising and rich idea that comes with a lot of unfortunate words and concepts.

Many of the discussions that followed the last Enterprise 2.0 Conference showed that Enterprise 2.0 reached a kind of maturity but has now to explore new frontiers. Maybe it has to get rid of its origins and the whole thing has to be rethought, rebranded etc... to become a standalone business discipline because if many businesses are ready to buy the promise they don't want to buy the history that comes with.

Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

John Brunswick

I completely agree - the Facebook analogy stood up well at the start of enterprise 2.0 to help people understand that profiling, "friends" and other concepts, but now needs to evolve.

As you mention "...difference between web 2.0 and enterprise 2.0, social networks and enterprise social networks is not in the product but in usage scenarios in context..." and I recently explored this in a post that suggests we really need LinkedIn in the enterprise and not Facebook due to this - http://aiimcommunities.org/e20/blog/you-dont-want-facebook-enterprise.

I would not be surprised to see the entire brand of E2.0 move to something more process oriented, as a series of benefits revolve around more effectively navigating white-space within groups related to processes and projects that are not met by tools that are currently designed to handle structured information (CRM, etc).

Good post!
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Peter Modigliani

Bertrand,

I agree Enterprise 2.0 hasn't crossed the chasm yet, partially because it's lacking an effective sticky message. I wrote about it following the E20 Conf Boston. While the E20 advocates at the conference are well aware of the benefits, the key is convincing senior management to invest resources in it and employees to harness IT in their business processes.

http://www.defenseacquisitionenterprise.com/2010/06/making-enterprise-20-sticky.html

When I present E20 to the Pentagon, I start off by saying this is NOT Facebook, so don't get hung up over the word social. Yet as the excuses of older generations not being tech savvy enough for E20, I do counter with the fact they've fully adopted Facebook in their personal lives based on published demographics.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International