Get me to the swim meet on time

Community Topic(s):

Keywords: banking, E2.0, expertise management, knowledge management

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

I was in Toronto this week and, other than the unseasonably warm weather I enjoyed, also had a great conversation with a client that crystalized some things for me about how Enterprise 2.0 methods can transform information sharing. He works for one of the Big 5 Canadian banks in retail operations, and when I asked him if he used social media in his personal life, he said no, but that he lived vicariously through his wife and daughter who both were avid Facebookers.

He then told the following story:

I was taking my daughter to a swim meet and on the way there we realized we didn’t have the address. I told her to call the coach to find out where we needed to go, and she said “okay” and began typing on her phone. Annoyed, I said, “Aren’t you going to call coach? Honey? Yoo-hoo? Sweetie, stop typing and call the coach already.”

“Got it,” she interrupted, and gave me the address. “And by the way, Meghan’s dad said to avoid the last mile of the highway, cause it’s bumper-to-bumper.”

Puzzled, I asked her how she found all that out so quickly. “Facebook. I just posted the question as my status and Meghan saw it and responded.”

For him, it was an aha moment about how social media could transform information sharing. With a few seconds of typing, his daughter not only got the answer to her immediate question, but something beyond it: advice on how to cut time off of her trip.

Consider her other option: calling the coach like her father asked. Best case, the call would have pulled the coach away from what she was doing to answer a question that, clearly, didn’t require the coach to answer it. And it probably wouldn’t have provided the added information on traffic conditions, since the coach likely got to the swim meet hours before.

After he told the story, we spent a good half an hour riffing on how this use of social media might play out in his bank’s operations, from retail sales associates to back-end processing. Picture a new sales associate at a branch, for example, who has a question about how a particular flavor of mortgage should be processed or the specifics of its terms.

Sure, they could find someone at the branch who should know the answer, or page through FAQs, desktop guidelines, or product sheets, but first they need to know where these resources are and second, it’s going to take time to comb through them to find the info they need.

Picture instead the same employee posting a question to the internal community of other bank employees, much like my client’s daughter, and not only the speed of the response, but the possibility of getting additional information the employee didn’t even know they needed—the time saved and errors avoided by having up-to-date information and additional relevant context would be significant…and that’s just one interaction for one employee. Multiply it across thousands of employees across the bank, day in and day out, and you begin to glimpse what a mature E2.0 capability would do for an organization.

The final word

Despite the visionary optimism of this a part of the conversation, my client also shared some of the things holding his organization back from reaching this E2.0 end-state that were not only significant, but also things I hear clients in every industry say.

In the next post, I’ll go into these in some depth and present some thoughts on how to resolve them (or at least work in spite of them) in order to move forward as an E2.0 organization.

Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

Laurence Hart

Great example but...

One problem with E2.0 is that while at work, people may not be on the system when needed. If a quick response is needed, but the other mortgage processors are helping others or are engrossed in processing an application, the response may not be timely enough.

I think at work E2.0 is extremely valuable. I just think that for some jobs, expecting instant response is something that could be tough to achieve consistently.

-Pie
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Joe Shepley

Agreed...

...but in this it's not so different from the E1.0 (aka phone a friend) approach, but does have some advantages.

First, by opening it up to a wider audience than just the folks the questioner knows personally, there's a higher likelihood of finding an answer faster, especially for those questions that lots of folks might know the answer to.

Second, if the knowledge/expertise management app can be delivered via mobile devices, then folks will (almost) always be connected no matter the time, day and night.

The last advantage, only sort of related to your point, is that the answer is provided for all to see, so it'll help more than just the initial questioner and, if it's inaccurate, others can chime in and correct it--neither is the case with phone a friend.

Thanks (as always) for jumping in and getting the discussion started!

Cheers,

Joe
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Brian Goldinger

That's fine when its more 'business' than 'social'

Joe - liked the blog post. Your example spells out a time when there is "value" (subjective) in both the recipient getting an answer and in the respondant providing it - a mutually beneficial win-win for this circumstance. I think I'm still a skeptic (and I assume others may be as well) when the use of E2.0 is for more social than business. For example, there are internal blog posts and discussions going on right now at work about the upcoming Super Bowl since it is being hosted here in Indy. Some discussions seem to have legitimate business value (confirming parking policy in company lots/garages, asking about telecommuting policies, etc), but there are others that are much more water-cooler talk, writ LARGE (who's going to win, what will you be doing that day). I wonder if I'm the only one who fears that E2.0, at least in some respect, allows for far greater non-value-added activities to affect more people, in a larger network, with more interruptive force. Of course, maybe that's the price you pay, lots of haystack to glean the few needles, and needles you didn't even know you had or needed.

Or maybe I'm just cynical and grumpy. Wouldn't be the first time I've been accused of it...
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Chris Walker

Cynical & Grumpy :-) No offence intended

Or, accept that there will be the non-business stuff such as we have with phones, emails, meetings (chit chat), etc. We're people and we're social. We're also (mostly) professionals that know what needs doing and how do get it done.

A few weeks ago I needed to prepare a presentation for an ARMA event in Europe. My "real" colleagues were too busy to help me out so I turned to the IM community via Twitter. The response was great as I had a few people volunteer to review my material and provide feedback that went into the final product (Thanks again, Laurence).
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Brian Goldinger

None taken!

...and while typing this reply, Cynical and Grumpy realized that he himself was indeed using Social Business tools.

And his heart grew E2.0 sizes that day :-)

(with apologies to Dr Seuss)
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Joe Shepley

What's old is new

Brian and Chris,

I think your exchange sums up what is both so remarkable and unremarkable about E2.0 for me: even though it's this new way to do business (and personal) activities, it's subject to the same pros and cons as its E1.0 predecessors. Every challenge, risk, benefit, payoff, etc., is something we've been struggling with (although perhaps in slightly different guises) with previous modes of communication and collaboration, from face-to-face and snail mail, to the phone, email, and IM.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to jump in and keep the conversation going!

Cheers,

Joe
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International