"Social" behaviors and the 90-9-1 rule

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

In 2006, Jakob Neilsen wrote in Alertbox about the 90-9-1 rule...

"User participation often more or less follows a 90-9-1 rule:

  • 90% of users are lurkers (i.e., read or observe, but don't contribute).
  • 9% of users contribute from time to time, but other priorities dominate their time.
  • 1% of users participate a lot and account for most contributions: it can seem as if they don't have lives because they often post just minutes after whatever event they're commenting on occurs."

Another dimension of this phenomena is the degree to which potential community participants actively utilize the tools that are available.

Those of us who "do" a lot of public social networking often make the assumption that everyone else also does so. 

Not so fast.

Earlier this week, I surveyed 650 individuals from organizations that use our industry's technologies in some way, shape or form. Not exactly a technologically unsophisticated bunch. So how deeply has the use of major public social technology penetrated into this target population?

Not very.

I asked the group whether they had engaged in 11 difference social behaviors over the past 3 months. Of the 11, a majority of the group were active in only two relatively superficial social behaviors  -- 1) reading blog posts in a reader (vs. via email) -- 64%; and 2) posting something on Linked In about a business-related topic -- 59%.

Ever participated in a discussion group on a social site on a business topic? -- only 31% actively do so.

Ever commented on a blog post? -- only 29%.

When it comes to tweeting, only 19% have a Twitter account. Only 9% have re-tweeted a business-related posting.

We are clearly in the midst of a revolution. But we need to remember that it is one that is still in its early stages.

Here's the full list. Feel free to reuse the information; just link back here.

Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

Nick Inglis

Seems like people may not have understood what a "reader" is.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
John Mancini

You might have a point there. Number seemed a bit higher than I would have thought given how low all the other numbers were.

I know on my own blog, it appears about 40% or so per Feedburner are "reading" via email.

http://www.aiim.typepad.com
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Max Pucher

John, there is an opportunity in E20 for those that want it. But not for everyone. I always ask in my presentations who does actively blog or twitter and who uses facebook. My audiences are all ages in groups of 50 to a 100 so it is not a demographic only. Usually I am the only one to actively post, and then there are 2-5 on facebook or twitter. Within corporations that will be worse, because people do not share knowledge for political reasons. So empowerment with E20 is not about hoping that someone will do it. Empowerment is about authority, goals and resources (money and people) so that the process owner can execute. Empowerment is not decisionmaking authority for anyone either! More on: http://isismjpucher.wordpress.com/2010/05/15/the-knowledge-between-your-ears/
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
John Mancini

I think the other issue is that there are so many measures of engagement. I mentioned Charlene Li's new book in a previous comment. She has some good data on "engagement" grouped by these kinds of behaviors...

Watchers: 1) Watch video 2) Listen to a podcast 3) Read a blog 4) Visit a consumer review site 5) Visit a forum / message board

Sharers: 1) Share videos online 2) Share photos 3) Update social network 4) Update micro-blog

Commentators: 1) Commented on a news story 2) Commented on a blog 3) Commented / reviewed on a price comparison site 4) Review on a retail site 5) Review on a consumer review site

Producers: 1) Write a blog 2) Write a news story 3) Upload a video

Her percentages on engagement against these definitions...(which seem high too me, BTW)...

Watchers = 78%
Sharers = 63%
Commentators = 34%
Producers = 26%

here's the link for her stuff -- way good -- http://www.charleneli.com/resources/engagement-pyramid-data/

Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Douglas Schultz

I agree with what Nick said about a "reader". I was just explaining what that was to someone this week in showing how they could set up google searches with results coming back at some interval via an RSS feed.

The statistics seem to echo our own company's usuage of Yammer. I started introducing it to people a year ago with the hopes of people sharing links and thoughts via this instead of the typical email a bunch of people. The majority of the people just read what's posted by others. Most say they learn from what others share, but they just don't seem to think about doing it themselves. I agree that it is still in the early stages of a revolution. Thanks for sharing those statistics.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Bert Sandie

I recommend reading the book "Groundswell" as it provides some great insight into the types and behaviors of users in this new world of collaboration. My own findings inside the enterprise at Electronic Arts follow what is written in the book and I would add that having a dynamic well-connected Enterprise 2.0 evangelist and community manager are key to driving adoption and ongoing usage inside any company.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
John Mancini

Good points. I liked that book too.

Her new one -- Open Leadership -- is also quite good. I particularly like it because you hardly ever hear the words (I listened to it on the treadmill -- I know, very nerdy) "Enterprise 2.0". Instead, she focuses on the business objectives. Here's a link for the book. http://www.amazon.com/Open-Leadership-Social-Technology-Transform/dp/0470597267
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International