Organizing Chaos -- Tag It!

Community Topic(s):

Keywords: search, classification, content, folksonomy, Taxonomy, tags

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

One of the most powerful means of filtering, sorting and searching information that has emerged as part of social computing is the use of “tags” to classify content of all types. Associating tags with content creates a set of metadata that is used to find content. This metadata provides a new paradigm for finding content which compliments the traditional search mechanisms that users are familiar with.

Why do we want to make our enterprise data easier to find? Research published in 2009 by IDC, estimates that information workers average 8.8 hours a week looking for information, with a cost of $14,209 a year. Imagine if we could reduce this cost by as little as 10% then we would save employees almost one hour each week in their ability to find information. Tagging content in our enterprises appropriately will help employees find the “right” information more efficiently.

Let’s start with setting some context on two different methods for classifying information in our enterprises.

  • Taxonomy is defined as a system of classification that is based on a structured and controlled method to annotate and categorize content.
  • Folksonomyis defined as a system of classification derived from the practice and method of collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content.

Perhaps the table shown below will help better delineate the differences between the two classifications systems.

Folksonomy

Taxonomy

Bottom-up

Top-down

Democratic

Controlled

Flexible

Rigid

Evolving

Static

Crowdsourced

Maintained

To better understand the value of tagging, let’s have a quick look at one of the early adopters of tags was the photo-sharing site Flickr. Flickr used tagging to help classify and categorize the millions of images that users were adding to their site. Their tagging system is extremely robust, easy to use, is used as part of their search algorithm, and the tag clouds show different view of the content available

Tag clouds have gained growing popularity in the past five years as a means to bolster our ability to find information efficiently and effectively. You will now see tags and tag clouds used for a wide variety of content types including images, videos, and documents.

A common discussion topic with regards to tags is the use of taxonomy vs. folksonomy. My own experiences and knowledge with using tags has led to the realization that a blended approach may lead to the best results for the users of the system.

Here are some best practices that will lead to a blended approach tagging system that provides a great user experience:

  • Allow tags to be easily added to content: During creation of the content allow the tags to be added easily, intuitively, and quickly; and allow tags to be added to existing content (i.e., by clicking on an ‘edit tag icon’ that pops up a dialog to edit)
  • Provide Type-ahead for tags: When adding tags use a type-head system that shows the users the available choices based on what they are typing and displays how many times the tags have been used (i.e., think about how Outlook works with names).
  • Allow new tags to be added by everyone: When adding a tag, if it does not already exist then the user will automatically create it. The next time any user chooses to use this tag it will automatically appear as available for selection.
  • Pre-load common tags: Have content managers, managers, and experienced users tag new content based on some a pre-defined set of taxonomy.
  • Show a tag cloud on key content pages: The tag cloud reinforces to the users the importance of tagging their content and provides a navigation method to popular content.
  • Use tag data as part of the enterprise search algorithm/solution.
  • Educate users on best tagging practices: Provide a cheat sheet and/or short tutorial video that demonstrate the best practices for tagging content.

Some additional best practices for the different types and uses of Tag Clouds are explained in this article by Vitaly Friedman.

I leave with a simple call to action – “Just Tag It!”

Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

Meg Duncan

I love the idea of tagging. David Weinberger also mentions it at length in his book "Everything is Miscellaneous". However, the one thing that one needs to make sure is included is the records information. Is the document official, what retention it gets, what schedule it belongs too. I truly believe we can use tagging for the records aspect, but I haven't quite figured out how. And to tag onto that thought (pun intended), training by the records managers on tagging documents as records would have to be handled somehow.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Stephanie Dueck

I've been struggling with the Taxonomy vs Folksonomy question for some time now. I love the concept of folksonomy and have definately made use of them in Flickr and Del.icio.us, but continue to struggle with the public vs enterprise searching needs. When you are searching a public site like Flickr and Del.icio.us, you are looking for anything you can find "about" or "like" a given subject. When you are searching within an enterprise, you are generally looking for something a bit more specific so I think a structured search would be more effective. I would really be interested in other peoples thoughts on this. Has anyone implemented a folksonomy within an enterprise? Is it meeting the need? Just curious.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply
Wayne Hoff

I agree with you, Stephanie. What makes folksonomies like Flickr and Del.icio.us work is sheer volume: there are millions of users, of which (I'm guessing) some 80% are not tagging but only browsing. The 20% that are tagging still make up a critical mass that renders the folksonomy useful to the other 80%. Additionally, we have to assume that the 80% have the same sense of how things should be tagged as the 20%, otherwise they would quit using the site very quickly.

That's a far cry from the enterprise, where the 80-20 needs to be 20-80 before any hope of a workable folksonomy. And within that microcosm, all employees do not have the same sense of how things should be tagged, in fact they can have very different views on how data should be tagged.

There may be a lot of potential in folksonomies, but I don't think we're there yet. Thanks for the original post and thoughtful responses.
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Andromeda Wuebker

Hi Bert,

Interesting post. I would like to get the article referenced in IDC but you haven't left enough info to search for it. Could you please respond with full reference (i.e. article name, author, publish date, etc).

Thanks,
AW
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Bert Sandie

Here is a quick follow-up to some of the comments. My experiences are in a company of approximately 10,000 employees you will quickly get to thousands of tags based on a couple of years with approximately 1,000 contributions per year which is easily a critical mass of information.

A couple of tricks that have helped us:

- we try to review all of the posts and add tags and in some cases edit them
- our system uses a type-ahead mechanism that shows you different choices and the usage of that tag to date. For example, if you type in "ren", it shows:
rendering (289)
renderinggroup (128)
rendition (12)
rent (5)
Users will then select one of these tags if it is what they are looking for or else type in something new.
- we pre-populate tags into the system based hence creating a taxanomy
- anyone in the company can add a tag to an existing piece of content regardless of if you are the author or not
- include tag meta-data as part of search engine

I hope this helps!

Bert
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International