Is Introduction of Enterprise 2.0 an Objective or Subjective Process?

Community Topic(s):

Keywords: adoption, enterprise 2.0

Current Rating:
(0 ratings)

Don’t believe me. Unless you do believe me. Make up your own mind.

That’s how I’ll be starting my presentation this Friday, October 15th, when I’ll be speaking at SharePoint Palooza here in Seattle. SharePoint Palooza is billed as “All You Can Eat SharePoint 2010. Real Experts. No Fluff. No Filler.  Just Meaty SharePoint Goodness.”

My presentation, which I’ll be delivering to the executive summit, is entitled “Leveraging SharePoint for Employee Engagement”.  I’ve summarized it this way:

Do your employees feel they have the tools they need to do their best work every day? Companies whose employees can answer a resounding “Yes!” to that question enjoy significantly higher levels of employee engagement, which in turn yields higher productivity and bottom line benefits both in increased revenue and decreases in costs associated with employee turnover. SharePoint’s ability to make content more discoverable, knowledge more shareable and companies more collaborative makes it a significant tool in any strategy to increase employee productivity and engagement. But you can’t just take it out of the box and turn it on. The key is to apply SharePoint to real, defined, and recognized problems so that your employees can do better what they’ve been trying to do all along. This session will look at some key areas in your organization where you can apply SharePoint to improve employees’ work experiences and generate a by-product of increased engagement. 

That summary should sound familiar if you’ve been reading my blog posts here. I am a strong advocate for the idea that giving employees the collaboration tools they need strengthens the organization both through improved productivity and a resulting increase in engagement. 

But the thing to remember is that I base that opinion on my research and, more significantly, on my experience and observation. If you have a different experience and observation, you may not believe that installing SharePoint or any other Enterprise Software Platform – social or otherwise – will make a difference to employee engagement levels in your company.  That’s OK; you make up your own mind.

And if you think Enterprise 2.0 is worth some investment, I guarantee that you, I and your employees will have different ideas about the best way to shape the Enterprise 2.0 environment. 

To be honest, I find it hard to believe there is an objectively right and wrong way to introduce Enterprise 2.0 elements into your company. My intuition tells me that there are too many subjective factors involved to ever be able to make Enterprise 2.0 an easy, clean, step-by-step process akin to building a Lego model or an Ikea table. Overall company culture, attitudes of upper management, individual employees’ risk tolerance, IT’s responsiveness, internal marketing’s ability to explain benefits and excite a user base, and so many more esoteric considerations carry weight in the adoption challenge. And it seems to me the weight is differently distributed from one organization to another. 

Or maybe I’m the one out of step here. Maybe introduction of Enterprise 2.0 can be turned into a homogenized process.

I was recently interviewed in a research study that has a goal of developing a predictive model for the success of hypothetical collaboration tools. The researchers want to use their predictive tool to guide companies by stating definitively which attributes of the tool or the community the tool is deployed in are most important to determining its likely success.

It would be comforting to have a checklist of cultural attributes that need to be present for Enterprise 2.0 success, followed by a page of managerial practices that must be followed at least 90% of the time, which then led to a list of values to instill, followed by a guide to features most likely to excite interest and for all of them an overall sequencing calendar to tell you the right order in which to do things. 

I don’t know. Is something like that likely to work?

Or is it truer that no outsider can tell you with any certainty what will work in your organization? I can tell you what worked for me. I can tell you what considerations were most important for me and predict my future success based on how well I learned my subjective lessons. But in the end don’t you have to make up your own mind?

Report

Rate Post

You need to log in to rate blog posts. Click here to login.

Add a Comment

You need to log in to post messages. Click here to login.

Comments

Carolyn MacNeill

I wholeheartedly agree with this post, and I think the lack of an ‘Ikea-like’ process for fitting the E2.0 pieces together is what makes (some) people nervous, and can inhibit adoption of social technologies. We wrote a post on our blog last year titled ”Pave Your Own E2.0 Way,” (http://inmagicinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/pave-your-own-enterprise-20-way.html) which reinforce many of your points and emphasizes that there is no right way to use enterprise social networking tools. This is both its blessing and its curse.

Because it’s where I am in my life, I liken this to having kids. Nothing (and I mean nothing) is going to prepare you for being a parent other than jumping in and being a parent. You can read all the books you want on how to get your kids to sleep at night, how to get them to eat their veggies, to say please and thank you, etc. And one parent’s success does not always translate from child to child. Similarly, one company’s success with E2.0 does not guarantee a similar success for a different organization. However, with a few simple guidelines and objectives, one can at least get started without becoming paralyzed for lack of an “easy, clean, step-by-step process.”

Even though I keep waiting for the “Standard Parents Handbook,” there’s a reason one does not exist. There just is no template. And we shouldn’t hold our breath for a standard E2.0 deployment manual either. Both efforts require time, patience, an understanding of internal and external influences, and, most of all, the ability to fail and try again. And in the meantime, it can’t hurt to have a couple of lollipops on hand just in case. ;)

Carolyn MacNeill

http://blog.inmagic.com

Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

Ethan Yarbrough

Carolyn, thanks so much for your thoughtful comment. I really respond to your parenting analogy. Isn't all parenting an improv show with no intermission? And I've heard the same said of business leadership. What can make your improvisational actions successful, though, is if you have a vision of the end state you're after. If you know what you're trying to achieve, you have a better chance of succeeding, even if you follow an inconsistent pattern to get there.

I often return to the POST mnemonic from Bernoff & Li's book Groundswell as a guide for successful Enterprise 2.0 adoption. P - People (involve the people who will use the tools in designing/defining them), O - Objective (know what you are trying to achieve), S - Strategy (use the answers to the first two to inform your strategy, and -- very important -- have a strategy), T - technology (too often companies start by settling on a technology and then try to fit it to their goals. Better to involve the people, define your objectives and articulate a strategy that fits your organization and then let those truths lead you to the technology that fits best).

Finally: is there a way to get kids to eat their veggies? I'd like to know. Dad's rage isn't really working in my household...

Thanks again. Keep up the great thinking!

E
Report
Was this helpful? Yes No
Reply

This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of their employers or of AIIM International