Document Scanning and Capture: Local, Central, Outsource - What's Working Best?

Dec 11, 2009

cover
This report compares strategies for outsourced, centralized and distributed scanning, and concludes that there is a move back to centralized scanning operations, along with a greater investment in capture and recognition software to automate data capture and indexing processes. Although outsourcing has cost and management benefits, quality of indexing and difficulty of integration back into electronic archives are given as the biggest disadvantages.

Meanwhile, more reliable and more capable scanners, more automated capture processes, and in particular, the availability of a multi-function scanner/printer in almost every office has led over the last 5 to 6 years to a new model of distributed scanning, local to the office staff processing the documents. In this report, we look at the issues and potential benefits of these different approaches, and consider the potential Return on Investment (ROI) across the more popular application areas.

Download the Report

View Attached Document

By downloading, you agree to have your contact information passed on to the limited sponsors of this publication for the purpose of following up on your interest in this topic.

Underwritten By:

ABBYY USA Software House
Autonomy
EMC Corporation
Epson
Image Source Inc
Visioneer, Inc.